ECONOMIC HOLOCAUST
By: Berhanu Nega
Introduction
The HIV/AIDS pandemic, which was considered to be the most serious
health
hazard facing humanity this past century, is by now widely acknowledged
to be
the most serious threat to the development efforts of developing
countries. An
epidemic that supposedly started in the developed countries has quickly
become the "disease of the poor" aggravated by the limited
financial capability
and institutional weaknesses of poor countries. Some of the benefits of
development that accrued to poor countries over the past half a century
or so
are quickly eroded because of this scourge. The most affected, of
course, are
countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. HIV/AIDS will have reduced life
expectancy
in Africa by 2005 from 60 to 45 years wiping out the progress achieved
in the
past three to four decades. Nine million African people have died of
AIDS
since the epidemic started in the early 80s, 2.2 million in 1999 alone.
Over 23
million Africans are currently living with HIV amounting to two thirds
of the
world’s total. In sixteen African countries more than one in ten adults
under 50
are infected. There are already 12 million African children that have
lost their
mother or both parents. What is even more alarming is the rapid pace of
its
spread. In 1999 alone there were four million new infections in Africa.
The crisis has affected all sectors of society. According to the
International
Labor Organization, "AIDS threatens every man, woman and child in
Africa
today. The pandemic is the most serious social, labor and humanitarian
challenge of our time." It has
killed teachers, business managers, workers,
farmers, political leaders, and all kinds of professionals. Still, the
amount of
effort put to fight this scourge is far from what is necessary to
mitigate its
disastrous effects. While AIDS activists and some Non Governmental
Organizations have tried to increase awareness about the disease and
even
taken positive measures at curbing its spread and caring for the
afflicted, the
epidemic is not getting the full attention of stakeholders in society
that it
certainly deserves. Only recently and largely prodded by international
pressure,
African governments have started to make a concerted effort in fighting
its
spread. The business community, save for some exceptions, has largely
ignored
the problem as if it has no effect in
its core activities. African businesses, as a
recent survey of the business community in the continent suggests, seem
to be in
denial. On the other hand, it is becoming increasingly obvious that
fighting and
eventually winning the epidemic requires the combined efforts of
governments,
the business community, civil society institutions, NGOs and the
community at
large.
Ethiopia is one of the highly affected countries in Africa. At 10.63%
adult
HIV/AIDS prevalence rate, there are some three million people infected
by the
virus at the end of 1999
claiming the lives of 280,000 people in 1999 alone.
That is an average of 767 people per day! In the number of infected
people
and death rate, Ethiopia is second in Africa following South Africa. The
economic, social, and psychological effect of this epidemic is currently
being felt
in all sectors of the society, and, without an immediate and concerted
action by
every one, it could have a truly disastrous effect on our society in the
future.
Despite such a high prevalence rate, however, the response of the
various
sectors of the society is far from what is necessary to avoid the
looming
disaster. This is particularly true to the Ethiopian business community
who, if
initiated, has the wherewithal to contribute significantly towards the
struggle
against this plague.
This short paper is designed to present the case for business
involvement in the
fight against HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia. It tries to argue that businesses in
Ethiopia
have the moral, social and economic responsibility to get involved in
the fight
against HIV/AIDS in the country. It in particular tries to argue that
the
long-term self-interest of business requires its involvement. It also
tries to
identify specific activities that businesses could undertake to
effectively
contribute towards this struggle. The next section presents an overview
of the
social and demographic effects of HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia in comparison
with a
few selected African countries. This is followed by a discussion on the
macro
and micro economic effect of the epidemic in Ethiopia focusing on the
potential
cost of the epidemic on business and its effect on the bottom line. The
last
section presents the arguments for business involvement in the fight
against
HIV/AIDS and suggests some of the modalities of its involvement.
II. The Social and Economic Effects of HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia
The social and economic impact of HIV/AIDS cannot be overstated. If
unchecked, it
is an epidemic that can destroy a whole generation. It destroys the
human capital of a
society that is desperately required for development. It weakens our
social and
economic institutions. It could obliterate
the family as an important institution as more
and more children become orphans. It has serious negative effect on
economic
performance both by affecting the overall output of a country and by
making the cost
of business prohibitively high.
Social and Demographic effects:
If we look at the global picture, there were some 33.4 million people
estimated to be
infected by the virus at the end of 1998. Of this total number, 22.5
million (67.4%)
are in Sub-Saharan Africa, 6.7 million (20.1%) are in South and South
East Asia, and
1.4 million (4.2%) in Latin America. The rest of the world combined
accounts for only
2.8 million infected or about 8.4% of the total. If we look at the trend
in new
infections, SSA’s picture looks very grim in deed. Of the 5.8 million
people newly
infected through out the world in 1998, 4 million (69%) are in Africa.
(See table 2 in
appendix)
As intimated earlier, Africa is the most affected continent in the
world. Within Africa,
South Africa with 4.2 million affected leads the pack followed by
Ethiopia with 3
million (of which 2.9 million are adults) and Nigeria is third with 2.7
million people
infected. (See table 1 in appendix). The number of children orphaned at
age 14 or less
is highest for Uganda where the virus struck earlier with 1.7 million
orphans followed
by Nigeria with 1.4 million and Ethiopia is third with 1.2 million
orphans. However,
partly owing to the low level of income and the weakness of our health
infrastructure,
the number of people dying from the disease is the highest in Ethiopia
compared with
other African countries. In South Africa, where there are the highest
number of people
infected, the death to infection ratio is about 6% (with an estimated
250,000 people
dead in 1999). In comparison, the
ratio for Ethiopia is 9.33%, (which is more than
one and half times that of South Africa. The cumulative number of AIDS
deaths in
Ethiopia since the epidemic struck in the early 80s is conservatively
estimated at 1.2
million and expected to increase to 1.7 million by the year 2002. This
is about 6.4%
of the total AIDS deaths in the world for a population a little less
than 1% of the world
population. If present trends continue (i.e. using the low prevalence
estimate of the
government) Between 2002 and 2014, an additional 3.35 million Ethiopians
are
expected to die from the disease raising the cumulative number of people
that will die
of AIDS to 5.25 million people by 2014.
One obvious implication of this is a significant decline in the life
expectancy of the
average Ethiopian. The life expectancy at birth is currently estimated
by the Central
Statistical Authority to be about 50 years without taking into account
the effect of
HIV/AIDS. "However, due to the large number of infant, children and
young adult
deaths due to AIDS, it may only be about 42 years." By the year
2014, the life
expectancy that would have been 56.4 years without AIDS is expected to
reduce to
only 46.5 years owing to the HIV/AIDS pandemic. AIDS is also claiming
the lives of
children at an alarming rate. The infant mortality rate, expected to
decline from the
current 97 per 1000 live birth to 79 by the year 2014 without AIDS will
increase to
85 because of it while child mortality rate will be 147 because of the
disease from the
expected 127 without the disease.
According to the Ethiopian Ministry of Health,
"AIDS could soon become the major cause of death for children under
the age of five,
worse than other major causes such as diarrhea and respiratory
diseases." The total
population of the country that could have been 92 million by 2014 will
only be 85
million because of the disease.
The epidemic is having a strong and negative impact on the health sector
of the
country particularly given the government’s weak financial capacity.
According to a
study by Kello, the cost of hospital care for an AIDS patient ranges
from birr 425 to
3140 for an average of birr 1800.
The total cost of caring for AIDS patients,
according to government estimates is about 87 million birr in 2000
expected to rise to
185 million by the year 2014. According to UNAIDS, if Ethiopia is to
adequately
care for all the AIDS patients the required health expenditure will rise
by 74 to 121
million USD. This is an additional 3 to 5 dollars in per capita income
that the country
does not have and need to get from foreign sources. Currently, as much
as 42% of all
the country’s hospital beds are occupied by AIDS patients and this is
expected to rise
to 54% by the year 2004 leaving only 46 % of the beds for all other
afflictions in the
country. Given the wide spread occurrence of other epidemics such as
malaria in the
country and the miserable condition of the country’s health sector, it
is not difficult to
imagine the potential increase in mortality caused by other diseases
because of the
suffocation of the health care system by the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
The epidemic also affects the education sector. It does so by, among
other things, the
increase in the number of teachers that die of the disease and/or by the
rate of
absenteeism of infected teachers. A rough estimate of the size of this
is given by the
percentage of primary students that have lost a teacher because of AIDS.
As can be
seen from table 1, the highest rate (3.9%) is in Botswana mainly because
of the high
adult prevalence rate (35.8%) followed by Kenya and Uganda at about
(1.6%) where
the epidemic started earlier than Ethiopia. The rate for Ethiopia is a
significant 1.17-%.
That is 51,000 primary school pupils out of 4.3 million that have lost
teachers for
AIDS in 1999. For a country that has a serious shortage of trained and
experienced
teachers, it will neither be easy nor cheap to replace these teachers.
The Economic Impact of HIV/AIDS
As suggested earlier, HIV/AIDS is no more just a health and humanitarian
crisis. It
has become a monumental development problem through its negative effects
on a
country’s economy. There are various ways through which it affects the
economic
performance of a country. At the macroeconomic level, it reduces total
output and is
potentially inflationary. It negatively affects government budget by
increasing its
expenditure for healthcare and reducing revenues owing to the reduction
in output.
The foreign exchange position of the country is also affected because of
the high forex
demand to purchase medicine and related products. The increased AIDS
related
expenditure also reduces national savings and thus investment. At the
firm level, the
epidemic could affect business by increasing the cost of doing business
through
increased labor costs, loss of trained human manpower, reduced
productivity and
absenteeism. It also affect business on the demand side by reducing the
demand for
goods and services that they
produce owing to the overall decline in output and
expenditure shifting as household expenditure for health care and
funerals increase at
the expense of other spending.
UNAIDS projections show that
the per capita income growth of Ethiopia will be
reduced by 0.6% by the year 2010, which is the lowest by comparison with
the
selected African countries reported in table 1 and much lower than the
average SSA
country in general. Still, this is a significant loss for Ethiopia.
According to our simple
projection, (see tables 3 in the appendix) this amounts to a loss of 60
birr in per capita
income by the year 2010 amounting to over 4.8 billion birr in total
income. It is
expected that Ethiopia will lose 8.3% of its potential workforce in 2005
and 10.5% in
2020. The loss of workforce could reach 2.45 million if we take the
government’s
conservative projections or could rise as high as 2.7 million if we use
UNAIDS’
prevalence rate as a base. With a mean expenditure for treatment of birr
1930 and
funeral expenses of birr 327, (several times more than the average
income of most
households) it is not difficult to imagine the reduced national savings
owing to AIDS.
This would certainly lead to a reduced investment thus reducing economic
growth. In
terms of foreign exchange allocation, if the country spends the required
amount of
money to import drugs to treat all AIDS patients; it could spend from 7
to 37 weeks
worth of all its forex quota in 1994. This is a foreign exchange that
the country could ill
afford.
Although there is no detailed data for Ethiopia, the disease affects
areas critical to our
economy its potential for development. According to recent surveys of
some African
countries, thirty percent of Malawi and Zambian teachers are infected
for example and
in many African countries the disease hit professionals hard. A 1997
study in Rwanda
showed that "the likelihood of HIV infection for a pregnant woman
to be 38 percent if
her husband worked for government, 32 percent if he was a white-collar
worker, 22
percent if he was in the army and 9 percent if he was a farmer." As
in other African
countries, AIDS affects the various sectors of the Ethiopian economy
differently.
According to a 1994 survey, the mean number of hours spent per week in
agriculture
per household was found to be 33.6 hours in non-AIDS afflicted
households, as
compared with between 11.6 and 16.4 hours in those that were afflicted.
The urban
economy is the most affected currently owing to the high prevalence rate
in urban
areas (13.4% for urban areas in general and 16.8% for Addis Ababa)
compared with
rural areas (with 5% adult prevalence rate). Within the urban economy,
following the
transportation sector (because of mobility) and the insurance sector,
the industrial and
services sector will be highly affected.
The effect on Business
In today’s very tight competitive environment, businesses need to do
whatever they
can to reduce cost to stay competitive. They certainly have to avoid any
thing that
could potentially raise their cost. From the experience of many African
countries, it
has been shown that the epidemic can seriously raise the cost of
businesses directly.
One such direct effect is the loss of skilled and experienced workers
including senior
staff which, both reduces productivity and increase the cost of training
new recruits.
Productivity of enterprises is also affected by absenteeism owing to
illness or attending
funerals of relatives or fellow workers. In a 1994 survey of 15 firms in
Ethiopia, AIDS
accounts for 53% of all incidences of illness over a five-year period.
According to the
Ethiopian Ministry of Health, "the number of workdays lost to
illness for a person with
HIV/AIDS can range from as little as 30 to as many as 240 days in a
year." UNAIDS
estimates that HIV will result in a fall of productivity to reach as
high as 50% in the
next five to ten years. Another direct cost to business is the cost of
health care. In
Zimbabwe, for instance, insurance premiums generally doubled between
1996 and
1998 while a flower company in Kenya reported that its health care costs
rose ten
times between 1985 and 1995. The costs of HIV to 5 firms in Botswana is
estimated
to rise 7 times between 1996 and 2004 to equal 5% of the total wage
bill. An average
Zimbabwean worker spends ten percent of his working time for funeral.
All this adds
significantly to the cost
of the business firm negatively affecting its competitiveness.
Business bottom line is affected not only on the cost side. Its profits
also suffer for
lack of demand for their products. Demand is affected both by reduced
income of
households and because of expenditure switching. The reduced income of
households
can be captured at the macrolevel by the decline in GDP owing to the
epidemic. As
stated earlier, the total income loss assuming a 0.6% percapita GDP
growth
reduction, could be close to 5 billion birr per year in 2010. In terms
of expenditure
shifting, the loss of demand for Ethiopian businesses (other than those
related to
healthcare and funerals) is estimated at about 4.1 billion birr for
medical care and
688.5 million birr for funerals over the next ten years. This comes to
an annual average
cost of health care and funerals of over 475 million birr. According to
one study, the
expenditure on normal goods and services of households in which someone
is
suffering from AIDS is often halved. As a Thai businessman succinctly
put it "dead
customers don’t buy."
All these combined could reduce the profitability of business
significantly. Although
there is no such calculation for Ethiopia, if we take the experience of
other African
countries, the loss in profitability could range from as little as 0.5%
in the less affected
industries such as textiles to as high as 15% in the highest affected
transportation
sector. (See graph in appendix).
Business Response to HIV/AIDS
Albeit scanty, the above evidence clearly indicate that businesses in
Ethiopia, like all
businesses in most affected countries in Africa, have a clear business
interest to be
engaged in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Although many businesses do not
see the
direct effect of the disease now, if current trends continue or get
worse for lack of a
concerted action, their bottom line is sure to seriously suffer in due
time. As the
competition gets stiff and the global economy gets more and more
knowledge
intensive, no country or business can afford to lose its professionals,
teachers,
managers or other skilled personnel at such a high rate and hope to
survive let alone
emerge victorious. Therefore, for the Ethiopian business community
self-interest alone
demands, even requires its constructive engagement.
However, the self-interest of business in general is not measured only
by the
short-term cost benefit calculus of the individual firm. The overall
socio-economic
environment on which business activity is conducted has a crucial
bearing on its
profitability or even survival. One such environment that is seriously
threatened by the
HIV/AIDS pandemic is social stability. The tremendous burden put to bear
on the
country’s health care system, the massive number of AIDS orphans that
are sure to be
added to the army of street children in our
cities, the decline in our education partly
owing to the loss of many experienced teachers, the erosion of our value
system as a
result of the obliteration of families, the weakening of our defense
forces because of
the high prevalence of the disease in the military, added to the overall
economic
decline expected to come as the disease takes its toll all add up to
erode the social
fabric that has woven us
together as a community. This atmosphere could seriously
threaten our social and political stability that is so necessary for
business to flourish.
But, that is not the only reason why businesses have to be involved.
There is
compelling moral and citizenship reasons that justify business
involvement. After all,
business owners and managers are human beings endowed with feelings and
concerns
for their fellow humans. Any natural disaster that strikes human beings
anywhere must
surely engender their sympathy and provoke action. That is why, although
the size and
modality of the responses differ, all of us (irrespective of our
religious or nationality
differences) feel the pain of a natural calamity that befalls humans
anywhere. It is the
inherent moral obligation of our existence that triggers such sympathy.
It is also to this
universal moral obligation that we appeal when we ask the support of
other
well-endowed countries during natural disasters in our own country or
the indignation
we feel when such support is denied for political or other reasons.
This moral obligation is even more compounded when the calamity occurs
in ones
own country. Here the universal moral requirement becomes even more
forceful
because of the sense of community one shares as a citizen of a country.
Being a citizen
of a country bestows on the individual certain privileges and
responsibilities that
non-citizens do not have. The right to freely trade in ones country
comes with the
responsibility to pay taxes and to play by the established rules of the
game. The right
to choose our leaders or aspire to any public office within our country
comes with the
obligation to use our votes properly as voters or commit our selves to
genuine public
service if elected. The strong case for a free market system is made on
the basis of the
wider benefits it accrues to the larger community. It is therefore
legitimate to expect
businesses to give back to the community in times of hardship some of
the excess
resources they are privileged to accumulate in good times.
If the above argument is somewhat valid, the question to address then is
why the
business community fails to get actively involved in the fight against
AIDS. There are
two plausible, albeit not justifiable, reasons for that. The first
reason is directly related
to the epidemic itself. Most business leaders do not seem to have
realized the
magnitude of the problem and its potential consequences. This is true
not only to
Ethiopian business but also businesses in other parts of Africa.
According to a survey
compiled for the Africa Competitiveness Report 2000, in a "comparison
between
perception of business and the best scientific estimates of infection
rates and AIDS
deaths, business leaders tend to perceive HIV infection levels to be
lower than those
recorded by UNAIDS...The average ACR figure (calculated as a population
weighted average for the 29 countries where UNAIDS data are available)
is 4.26
percent against a UNAIDS average of 6.16 percent." This is a
sizeable difference
especially when considering the fact that the survey was done in 1999
while UNAIDS
estimate was for 1997. This gap between scientific estimates and
business perception
is even wider for Ethiopia. As can be
seen from table 4 in the appendix, UNAIDS
adult prevalence rate estimates of 9.31% and 10.63% for 1997 and 2000,
is more
than three times the 3.02% business leaders estimate to prevail in the
work force. One
reason for this divergence could be a difference in the prevalence rate
of adults in the
general population and that of the work force. However, according to the
ACR
analysis, "there is also evidence
to support the view that these ACR figures reflect a
degree of denial" among the business community. This is partly an
indication that "the
full fury of the epidemic has yet to be felt and that business leaders
are unaware of
this." If the latter has some truth, one of the important tasks of
those already involved
in the fight against HIV/AIDS is to double their efforts to raise the
awareness of the
business community on the current status and future implications of the
epidemic.
In the Ethiopian case, there is also a more general problem that
afflicts the business
community when it comes to active participation in the affairs of the
larger community
namely apathy. Save for issues that narrowly concerns their own
businesses directly or
in exceptional cases where the country’s sovereignty is threatened by
outside forces,
the Ethiopian business community is very shy in making its presence felt
in the broader
concerns of the society. This is true both in areas it considers
political (peace and
stability, democratization...etc.)
and activities that it presumes are relegated to the
state (cleaning streets or neighborhoods for example). This is a trend
that damages the
credibility and respectability of business in the society. On the other
hand, this is a
trend that hurts society by robbing it of the skill and resources that
the business
community posses and that the community can use for the overall
advancement of
society.
Areas for effective business participation
If the case for the involvement of the business community is plausible,
the next step is
to identify the modality of its participation. Clearly, the
responsibility to contribute
towards the struggle against this epidemic should be equally shared by
all members of
the society. Effective struggle requires identifying the comparative
advantage of each
sector of the community for optimal use of the available resources. In
general, it is fair
to say that businesses are well placed to join the fight against AIDS
either by
themselves or in cooperation with the public sector and/or with
non-governmental
agencies active in the fight against AIDS.
In this regard, at least four areas can be identified for business
participation in the
prevention of the spread of the epidemic and in contributing to the care
of the already
afflicted on the basis of the successes registered in other countries.
These are:
1. Since heterosexual intercourse is known to be the main transmission
mechanism of
the HIV virus in Ethiopia and condoms are known to be at the heart of an
effective
prevention strategy, businesses can
use their experience in promoting their products
by introducing innovative marketing tools for the promotion and
marketing of
condoms and other mechanisms of safe sex.
2. Business marketing skills can also be used in identifying tools for
targeting highly
affected groups in the community such as the youth.
3. Businesses can take a number of work place actions to safeguard their
own
employees from the disease and contribute to the care of affected
workers. This could
be done through work place preventive educational programs and
instituting strong
measures against stigmatization of affected workers.
4. Businesses can also use their tremendous financial resources and
extensive contacts
in government to lobby for an effective AIDS policy in the country and
participate in
mobilizing the larger community for preventive action, contributing
towards the care of
orphans and the loving care of those afflicted by the disease.
Conclusion
Without a doubt, HIV/AIDS
is one of the most serious humanitarian and
developmental challenges facing the country today. By the total number
of infected
persons, Ethiopia is only second to South Africa in the African
continent, which is by
far the worst affected region in the world. There is no person in the
country that is not
affected by the scourge in one form or another. The disease has killed
many times
more compatriots than all
the wars this country has fought against foreign aggression in
this century combined. The struggle against this epidemic requires the
combined
efforts of the government, non-governmental organizations, professional
associations,
the donor community, and all citizens of this country. Businesses in
particular have
both the self-interest and moral duty to contribute to the struggle
against this epidemic.
They also have the skills and the means to make an effective and durable
contribution.
HIV/AIDS is not a mysterious punishment that is handed down by some
super natural
force. Its causes are known and, although the cure is not yet available,
there is
sufficient and widespread knowledge about the actions that need to be
taken to
prevent its transmission. Neither is it a problem that goes away if
ignored. It needs
concerted action to mitigate its disastrous effects. It is high time
that the Ethiopian
business community wakes up from its slumber and proves that it is a
good citizen of
this
community by making its human and material resources available to fight this
scourge of the century.